Okay, so why do we want to do a multi-site? Do we want folks to have access to their dashboard? Segregate the blogs from each other? Here are some options:
- One site, moderation queue for either posts or user accounts (whitelisted so they just post), and use the theme to differentiate between posts
- Multi-site, each person gets one or more sub-sites, they can control some settings
- Multi-site, each person gets one sub-site, but they are all standardized
One versus multi
Pros for one site: easy to maintain, easy to admin (moderate either users or content), can build everything in the front end, easy to dictate new features, easy to test assumptions, easy to license, easy to aggregate (inherent to singleness)
Cons for one site: not as flexible, no user options
Pros for multisite: each user can have their own site(s), capable for lots of customization, vastly different sites can live in one data- and code-base
Cons for multisite: harder to maintain, sites can quickly become restrained by network and risk not being useful versus having too dissimilar sites
Fiction or Journaling, choose one
We use our sites to post whatever, but I would say that the usefulness of scribe.works should focus in on one primary feature. Of course folks are going to use it for whatever, but if we set this boundary, we can support the site in a specific direction, and won’t get pulled off course.
For instance, if it is a fiction-focused site, that means we have expectations and tools to make posting fiction easier. On a single site we might have categories for different genres or worlds, or custom post types for different stories. On a multisite, we might load up page-builder themes to tell stories with visual elements, and focus on documentation for how to use them.
For journaling, a single site would be a group blog, but might have more social elements, with emoji and commenting heavily featured, or a timeline and easy tools to find and reuse tags. A multisite would have themes and plugins that help capture and share one’s thoughts, and maybe an onboarding process to help families blog together.
Now of course anyone writing fiction will share updates that are not fiction-related. Ours is not to prohibit or discourage, but rather set expectations on where we will expend energy and what our vision/roadmap is moving forward.
Who’s content anyways?
Then we get to the business of hosting. We are not interested in owning anyone’s stuff, but if we are hosting it, we have certain obligations, and have to set some ground rules. Why? Because the internet has all kinds of people, and setting rules help us all get along and understand what happens when we have to refer to the dice.
A few considerations:
- How is the info licensed? Do we want to impose a copyright/left restraint on fiction? Journals?
- What is allowed to be said? Do we want to use this site to protect free speech for any person wandering by, or do we just want a place to blog with friends?
- What is the exit plan? I know this sounds like a worst-case scenario, but you know you think about what happens when a service goes down, right @tim? So if we all suddenly become Luddites, what happens to content? Do we have an obligation to keep the site running for 60 days while folks figure out how to get their content moved off?
Now, a suggestion
Okay, with all that in mind, here are my suggestions, of which a couple things are interesting to me.
The Words Blog
- Single site, CC0, just our peeps (including new peeps we meet through the site)
- Focused on language, literacy and the evolution of thought
- Word of the Day, but really interesting and obscure ones
- Recommendations for reading, based on our current fancies, with small reviews and maybe a directory
- News round-ups for interesting articles, with break out discussions here on talkgroup
- Customized to make it easy to write, with smart forms that create interesting content
- Example for Word of the Day: fill out a form, and it creates a post that does auto-markup for definition HTML elements, adds metadata
- Markdown all over the place
- Embed other posts with shortcodes/links
- Concerted effort to aggregate on social networks, giving equal effort to federated nets and non-corporate media.
The Fiction Network
- Multisite, open license required, anyone with a world to build or a poem to share
- Focused on storytelling, roll out tools specific to sharing and expressing
- Aesop Engine
- Anthologize
- Central hub for resources and maybe discussion (talkgroup might be a better place for that)
- Light social networking on main site, smart directories that support writing, like a smaller scale NaNoWriMo, with shorter feedback loops so we create real value for everyone, including us
The Minimalist Journal
- Single or multisite
- Not sure about license
- Excellent theme(s) for reading short or long form pieces
- All text; no images
- How crazy would that be?!
In conclusion…
Think about that for a bit, let me know where you are coming from. I don’t have much to assert, because I will eventually get around to trying out all of the things I listed. I am more interested in drilling down what the project focus is.